THE war in Iraq threatened to spill
over into neighbouring countries yesterday when
Washington warned Syria and Iran to stay out of
the fight.
Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary,
accused Syria of arming President Saddam Hussein.
He said the shipments, including nightvision
goggles, were a direct threat to US and British
forces and he added that Washington would hold
Damascus accountable for “hostile acts” if the
traffic continued.
Mr Rumsfeld said the movement of military
supplies, equipment and people across the Syrian
border “vastly complicates our situation”. Asked
if he was threatening Damascus with military
action, he replied: “I’m saying exactly what I’m
saying. It was carefully phrased.”
Mr Rumsfeld also said that hundreds of
revolutionaries of the Badr Corps, who are
trained, equipped and directed by the Iranian
Islamic Revolutionary Guard, were operating inside
Iraq. He said American forces would be forced to
treat them as enemy “combatants” and the Iranian
Government would be held responsible for their
actions.
The surprise threats raised the spectre that
the war could suddenly and quickly spiral out of
control. Arab opinion was further inflamed last
night by reports that more than 50 civilians had
been killed in an air raid that hit a market in
the residential Baghdad neighbourhood of Shula.
Early today an enormous explosion rocked the
centre of Kuwait City. The blast damaged a
seafront shopping centre and cinema in the
fashionable Souk Sharq district near the Kuwaiti
parliament.
US military analysts said the missile was
probably a Chinese-made Silkworm usually used to
attack ships. Bystanders described the missile’s
trajectory as low — Silkworm missiles are designed
to fly low to avoid triggering early warning radar
systems.
Yesterday Britain’s senior army commander
warned Tony Blair that the British military was
already overstretched; the huge commitment of
troops to Iraq was “not sustainable over a long
period”. General Sir Mike Jackson’s statement
followed an admission by America’s ground
commander in the Gulf that overextended supply
lines and the enemy’s surprising resilience had
meant the war could last longer than predicted.
“The enemy we’re fighting is different from the
one we’d war-gamed against,” Lieutenant-General
William Wallace said. The US is sending 120,000
troop reinforcements, which will double American
combat power in Iraq.
Syria dismissed the US accusations. A statement
from the Syrian Foreign Ministry said: “What
Donald Rumsfeld said about the transportation of
equipment from Syria to Iraq is an attempt to
cover up what his forces have been committing
against civilians in Iraq.”
Mr Rumsfeld’s warnings came after Syria
hardened its opposition to the war this week.
President Bashar Assad of Syria publicly expressed
his hopes that Washington would fail in its
mission to overthrow the Iraqi regime. In an
interview published on Thursday in the Lebanese
daily Al-Safir, Mr Assad predicted that if
the US and Britain occupied Iraq, they would be
met by “popular resistance” that would prevent
them from controlling it.
He predicted that US troops would become bogged
down in Iraq as they did in Vietnam, or forced to
abandon the country as they did in the 1980s in
Lebanon, which is now under Syrian dominance.
His words were published on the same day as a
call by the country’s mufti for suicide attacks
against US forces. The call by Sheikh Ahmad
Kaftaro is unlikely to have come without the
approval of Mr Assad’s regime.
Syria is the only Arab member of the UN
Security Council. Although it voted for Resolution
1441, which led to the resumption of weapons
inspections in Iraq, it has been vehemently
opposed to war.
“America wants to remodel the region to its own
liking,” Mr Assad said, echoing repeated
criticisms from Damascus that the US is acting in
the interests of Israel.
Mr Rumsfeld’s intervention was unprompted,
coming at the end of his opening statement at the
Pentagon’s daily press briefing. Quoting US
intelligence, he said: “We have information that
shipments of military supplies have been crossing
the border from Syria into Iraq, including
night-vision goggles. These deliveries pose a
direct threat to the lives of coalition forces. We
consider such trafficking as hostile acts and will
hold the Syrian Government accountable.”
Moving on to Iran, Mr Rumsfeld said that any
military forces, intelligence personnel or their
proxies inside Iraq and not under the direct
operational control of General Tommy Franks, the
commander of US forces in the Gulf, would be taken
as a potential threat to coalition forces.
Mr Rumsfeld’s deputy at the Pentagon, Paul
Wolfowitz, became the first member of the Bush
Administration to admit publicly that the US had
failed to predict Saddam’s willingness to fight
back.
Mr Wolfowitz, one of the key architects of the
war, said: “We probably did underestimate the
willingness of this regime to commit war crimes. I
don’t think we anticipated so many people who
would pretend to surrender and then shoot. I don’t
think we anticipated such a level of execution
squads inside Basra.”
A quarter of the British Army is in Iraq and
General Jackson confirmed that there were
contingency plans to send in reinforcements to
replace exhausted troops if necessary. Half the
Army is now committed to operations around the
world and about 19,000 service personnel are tied
up in the standby firefighting force in Britain.
The reports of more Iraqi civilian deaths
yesterday, a day of prayer, came as coalition
warplanes mounted a second consecutive day of
intense bombing over Baghdad. Most of the
explosions were in the south, apparently targeting
Republican Guard units, but Shula is in the
northwest of the city. Osama Sakhari, a doctor,
said he counted 55 dead.
Pictures of the injured at a hospital were
broadcast by al-Jazeera, the Qatar-based satellite
channel, and al-Arabiya, based in Dubai. Both
stations also showed pictures of Iraqi civilians
vowing revenge.